Luke 15; 1-3,11-32
Laetare Ierusalem. The first
words in the traditional Latin Mass Introit for this Fourth Sunday in
Lent. Laetare Sunday, as it says on the front page of the leaflet: Rejoice, O Jerusalem: and come together all
you that love her: rejoice with joy, you that have been in sorrow: that you may
exult, and be filled . . . .
Something of a resting place along this highway of Lent. Think how
that great multitude of Hebrews must have felt as they passed from the desert
wilderness into the first lush valley of the Land of Promise. Their journey wasn't over. Not by a long shot. But what a wonderful time to pause and take
in the beauty all around them and to feast on the riches of the land.
Sometimes called “Refreshment Sunday.” Also in England called “Mothering Sunday”--
and in the Downton Abbey households of the great aristocracy a day when the
upstairs family would fend for themselves and the downstairs staff would be
given the day off to go home for a family visit. In churches where Lent is observed with a
more rigorous discipline, the one Sunday in Lent when you might have flowers on
the altar and something more than coffee on the refreshments table in coffee
hour.
Not a time to throw all our Lenten
observance overboard. Not yet a time for
the trumpets and feasting of Easter. But
a time to relax the disciplines just a bit, perhaps. A reminder that we aren’t earning our
salvation here, but simply learning,
learning to practice our mindfulness in the presence of the Lord whose property
it is always to have mercy. To learn again and again that it is only by his
grace and love that we can have any hope for this life or for the life to come.
But on into the week ahead,
with the continuing invitation to the keeping of a Holy Lent, by Self-examination
and repentance; by prayer, fasting, and self-denial; and by reading and
meditating on God’s holy Word. So
continued prayers of encouragement along the way, even as we pause here for
refreshment. Laetare Ierusalem. Even in the middle of deepest Lent the hymns of
Easter rumble underneath us. “Jesus lives! Thy terrors now, Can, O Death, no more appall
us. Jesus lives! By this we know, Thou, O
Grave, canst not enthrall us.” Laetare Ierusalem. with joy, you that have been in sorrow: that you may exult, and be
filled . . . .
The parable in our gospel reading from St. Luke this morning
probably the most familiar or at least one of the most familiar of all the
stories that people remember Jesus telling.
Certainly an appropriate reading from scripture for the middle Sunday of
Lent, with the great themes of Sin and Judgment, Repentance, and Reconciliation
much on our minds and in our hearts.
These great objective themes that are for each one of us as well deep
personal challenges. Sin and Judgment,
Repentance and Reconciliation.
Traditionally called the “Prodigal Son,” though we soon find it’s
not a story about one son, but about a father with two sons. This a familiar set up for Jesus. In Matthew 21 Jesus tells the priests and
elders of the Temple this story and asks a question: “A man had two sons. He went to the first and said, ‘Son, go and
work in the vineyard today.’ And he
answered, ‘I will not’; but afterward he repented and went. And he went to the second and said the same;
and he answered, ‘I go, sir,’ but did not go.
Which of the two did the will of his father?”
So, two kinds of sons, here in Luke. One good, one not so good, so
it seems. One son, the younger son, says, “Dad, I’m
tired of sitting around here in the sticks waiting for you to die so that I can
get my inheritance. How about you figure
out what that’s going to be and give it to me now so I can go and live my life
the way I want to live it?” Breathtaking,
of course. [Reminds me of a moment at
the family dinner table many years ago when in the midst of normal “how was
your day?” conversation our maybe 10 year old Daniel looked up and asked, “Dad,
do you have life insurance?” I've always
wondered about the train of thought that led to that question . . . .]
Within the deep culture and traditions of
ancient society, of course, the respect of a child for the parent is absolutely
foundational. First of all, as a younger
son he isn’t actually assured of any
inheritance. Whatever he would receive
would be as a gesture of generosity and love, and not strictly according to the
rules of inheritance. So it’s interesting to see what he simply assumes
here. And the lack of compassion. Filial piety.
The Father here not really a person to the son, but an object, to be
used.
We might expect the Father to explode in anger, deeply
offended. But that’s not what
happens. Instead—I suppose we might
imagine, with a heavy heart—instead, he agrees.
Divides the assets. And as we
recall, the son then heads off to the big city and a distant land and in short
order squanders all he has on wine, women, and song.
He hits bottom. Totally
without resources. Tries to get a job,
but all he can find is work that is the most humiliating and demeaning that can
be imagined, especially in the context of pious Judaism. Feeding pigs.
And so hungry and so poor that he finds himself actually envying the
pigs for the food that they’re eating. We
think, “that’s the moral of the story.
What happens to bad sons.” The
whole crushing reality, the devastating humiliation, finally crashes down on
him, his irresponsibility, his arrogance, his thoughtlessness, and without
being able to envision any other option, he determines finally to return home,
tail between his legs. Is it too
late? Not knowing what to expect but
hoping that he won’t be turned away, as he knows he deserves. Even his father’s servants have it better,
and perhaps at home he’ll at least be allowed to eat and be clothed.
And then, of course, we remember the return. And how even before this younger son gets to
the front door his Father is flying down the road to greet him and lift him
into an embrace. Forgiveness and mercy,
generosity. Kill the fatted calf! Feasting and rejoicing. The deep spirit of reconciliation that in Old
Testament Hebrew is encompassed in the word Shalom. Peace.
And we’d expect the story to end here. Let that be the moral of the story. “All is forgiven.” Which is of course strong and powerful in
itself, and often our conversation about this parable does end there. But of course the story goes on. Another turn.
Still one more son, we suddenly remember. The older son, the heir, the good son, so we think, the son who has
remained respectfully with his father. Who
is following the rules. Who kept his
nose to the grindstone. Always with a
smile.
But then all of a sudden the story takes this
new energy and direction, with a sudden explosion of the older son’s anger, hurt,
and jealousy. For all his loyalty, for
all his faithfulness and respect and hard work.
Never has he seen his father so full of love than in this moment. But not for me. You
never even gave me a goat to barbecue at a party for my friends, and now look
what you do for him.
Turns out there was something more going on here than we had
expected. Still waters run deep, I
guess. The genre is such a comfortable
one. The bad son and the good son, the
moralistic example. A template for
judgment. Be like this one, not like
that one. But suddenly the room is
spinning and we aren’t sure just where we are.
What is Jesus communicating here?
To the Scribes and Pharisees, to his disciples? For his church? For us? These two sons looked so different at first,
but now, the more we look at them, the more alike they turn out to be. Both of them entering the story with this
surging sense of grievance. This sense
of entitlement. A vortex of
self-centeredness. The younger son
speaks first. Give me mine now. And off he goes. The older son hasn't been saying anything,
apparently. Sucking it up. Perhaps for years and years and years. But in the end he reveals what he has been
thinking and feeling all along. He’s
been keeping score. You bet he has. For
both the Father is simply a means to end.
It’s all about them.
Good son/bad son stories are perhaps a little easier to
understand. But somewhere in this story
Jesus seems to expect us to see ourselves. Somewhere.
Or perhaps everywhere.
I remember thinking one
time—I saw this $100,000 recreational vehicle rolling down the interstate, a
smiling silver-haired couple sitting in the front. And on the back, a bumper sticker: we’re spending our children’s inheritance. Just thinking to myself, with a little bit of
a smile, I wonder what the kids think when they see that. I’m sure all smiles and hugs on the
outside. Hi mom! Hi dad!
Great to see you! Tell us about
your latest trip . . . . But deep
down. I wonder. In any event, it would certainly be
understandable if they didn’t sigh inwardly from time to time. The way Martin Luther described Man’s sinful
nature. Incurvatus in se. The human being “turned in on himself.” The refrain of what is really important at
the end of the day: I, me, mine; I, me, mine; I, me, mine.
And through the whole story, of course, the story of the Two Bad
Sons, there is the Good Father, who doesn’t just wait for either one of
them. Who is generous even when he knows
the score with the younger son, and rushes out the door and down the road to reach
him as he is returning. Who doesn’t
condemn or punish, but who goes out to the older son, who is out sulking in his
self-pity. Comforting, embracing,
forgiving. Inviting both sons to come to
the table and to feast at his banquet of celebration. To know his love.
Hold that image in your mind.
For all you’re worth, hold that image in your mind.
So just to note that before this story, in the first half of this
15th chapter of Luke, there is this whole series of parables: the parable of the Lost Sheep, of the Good Shepherd
who leaves 99 in search of the one wanderer.
Probably not the favorite story of the insurance agent who wrote the
policy on the flock. “You left all
ninety-nine in order to find just one?”
But Jesus says, “I tell you that in the same way there will be
more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine
righteous persons who do not need to repent.”
And the parable of the lost coin, the woman
who turns her house upside down to search for that coin and then, when she
finds it, throws a big party to celebrate, with a catering bill ten times the
value of the coin she has just found.
And then
the Parable of the Two Bad Brothers, and the Parable of the Father who goes out
for them. While they are still bad. Before they've apologized. He goes out to them. Hold that image in your mind.
Turns out
that from the Father’s point of view there aren't good sons and bad sons. Simply his sons. His dear children. Whom he loves. For whom he will do everything he can,
whatever it takes, to bring them home.
Go the extra mile. Go two extra
miles. Leave the flock and run after the
lost. Turn the house upside down. Climb up on a Cross, if that’s what it’s
going to take. That’s the kind of Father we’re talking about here. The kind that doesn't give up on us, no matter how far away
we go.
I read this
somewhere the other day, and I think in a very simple way it points us to the
bottom line of this Parable of the Two Bad Sons. Which is to get the right point in focus, of
Parable of the Father. When we arrive at
heaven’s gate and St. Peter meets us with the great register recording all our
life, and asks us, “why do you believe you should deserve to enter the Paradise
of God,” if our answer begins, “because I . . .,” then truly we are lost. “Because I . . . .” In any case we will have missed the point
of this Lenten journey, and our path once again this year to Jerusalem and Holy
Week and Good Friday. Not “because I,”
but “because he . . . .”
Continuing
this Lent, and to hold this parable in our view for a time. Sin, Judgment,
Repentance, Reconciliation. Let me see
if I can see myself in this picture. As
St. Paul says, “while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” If he was going to wait for us to come around
first, it was going to be a long wait. We
love him, because he first loved us.
Walk in
love, as Christ loved us and gave himself for us, an offering and a sacrifice
to God.
No comments:
Post a Comment